Antranik Tavitian / Houston Landing
In November, the U.S. Army withdrew convictions of 110 Black soldiers of the all-Black 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment after what was called the Houston Riot of 1917. The “incident,” which took place during the Jim Crow era, culminated months of racial torment against members of the 24th — including the brutal arrest and assault of two Black soldiers by white police officers.
Following the assaults, and amid rumors of further threats to soldiers, a group of more than 100 Black soldiers seized weapons and marched from their encampment on the eastern edge of present-day Memorial Park, into the city. Clashes erupted and the violence killed 19 white people, including four Houston policemen and four soldiers.
The Army’s historic decision comes over a century after the fact, and following the tireless efforts of dozens of descendants, private attorneys, civil rights activists, and students and professors at South Texas College of Law Houston.
So, after 106 years, why a reckoning now? Monique Welch explains.
Misinformation and false narratives: Experts say that research shows early false narratives were placed into the historical record and ultimately buried the truth about the incident. In addition to the proliferation of misinformation, researchers like historian John Haymond said there were other major hurdles over the years that delayed justice, including the passage of time.
Internal resistance from the military: Another major hurdle to justice was internal resistance from military leaders, as critics argued if the Army granted clemency in this case, it would open up a floodgate of other clemency appeals that would inundate the Army.
|